Hawaii Lemon Law Firms:
This is a list of law firms that are registered as specializing in Hawaii lemon law cases.

Hawaii Revised Statutes §§481I-1 to 481I-4

481I-1 Legislative intent.

The legislature recognizes that a motor vehicle is a major consumer purchase and that a defective motor vehicle creates a hardship for the consumer. The legislature further recognizes that a duly franchised motor vehicle dealer is an authorized service agent of the manufacturer. It is the intent of the legislature that a good faith motor vehicle warranty complaint by a consumer be resolved by the manufacturer within a specified period of time. It is further the intent of the legislature to provide statutory procedures whereby a consumer may receive a replacement motor vehicle, or a full refund, for a motor vehicle which is not brought into conformity with the applicable express warranties, as provided in this chapter. Finally, it is the intent of the legislature to ensure that consumers are made aware of their rights under this chapter and are not refused the information, documents, or service necessary to exercise their rights.

Nothing in this chapter shall in any way limit or expand the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other law.

481I-2 Definitions.

When used in this section unless the context otherwise requires:

"Business day" means any day during which the service departments of authorized dealers of the manufacturer of the motor vehicle are normally open for business.

"Collateral charges" means those additional charges to a consumer wholly incurred as a result of the acquisition of the motor vehicle. For the purposes of this chapter, collateral charges include, but are not limited to, manufacturer-installed or agent-installed items, general excise tax, license and registration fees, title charges, and similar government charges.

"Consumer" means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, or the lessee of a motor vehicle, any person to whom the motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of the express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle, and any other person entitled to enforce the obligations of the express warranty.

"Express warranty" means any written warranty issued by the manufacturer, or any affirmation of fact or promise made by the manufacturer, excluding statements made by the dealer, in connection with the sale or lease of a motor vehicle to a consumer, which relates to the nature of the material or workmanship and affirms or promises that the motor vehicle shall conform to the affirmation, promise, or description or that the material or workmanship is free of defects or will meet a specified level of performance.

"Incidental charges" means those reasonable costs incurred by the consumer, including, but not limited to, towing charges and the costs of obtaining alternative transportation which are directly caused by the nonconformity or nonconformities which are the subject of the claim, but shall not include loss of use, loss of income, or personal injury claims.

"Lemon law rights period" means the term of the manufacturer's express warranty, the period ending two years after the date of the original delivery of a motor vehicle to a consumer, or the first 24,000 miles of operation, whichever occurs first.

"Lessee" means any consumer who leases a motor vehicle for one year or more pursuant to a written lease agreement which provides that the lessee is responsible for repairs to such motor vehicle, or any consumer who leases a motor vehicle pursuant to a lease-purchase agreement.

"Motor vehicle" means a self-propelled vehicle primarily designed for the transportation of persons or property over public streets and highways which is used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. For purposes of this definition, a "motor vehicle" also includes a "demonstrator", which means a vehicle assigned by a dealer for the purpose of demonstrating qualities and characteristics common to vehicles of the same or similar model or type, but does not include mopeds, motorcycles, or motor scooters, as those terms are defined in chapter 286, or vehicles over 10,000 pounds, gross vehicle weight rating. For purposes of this definition, a "motor vehicle" also includes (1) an individually registered vehicle used for an individual's business purposes and for personal, family, or household purposes; and (2) a vehicle owned or leased by a sole proprietorship, corporation or partnership which has purchased or leased no more than one vehicle per year, used for household, individual, or personal use in addition to business use.

"Nonconformity" means a defect, malfunction, or condition that fails to conform to the motor vehicle's applicable express warranty and that substantially impairs the use, market value, or safety of a motor vehicle, but does not include a defect, malfunction, or condition that results from an accident, abuse, neglect, modification, or alteration of the motor vehicle by persons other than the manufacturer, its agent, distributor, or authorized dealer.

"Purchase price" means the cash price appearing in the sales agreement or contract and paid for the motor vehicle, including any net allowance for a trade-in vehicle. Where the consumer is a second or subsequent purchaser and the arbitration award is for a refund of the motor vehicle, "purchase price" means the purchase price of the second or subsequent purchase not to exceed the purchase price paid by the original purchaser.

"Reasonable offset" for use means the number of miles attributable to a consumer up to the date of the third repair attempt of the same nonconformity which is the subject of the claim, the date of the first repair attempt of a nonconformity that is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, or the date of the thirtieth (30th) cumulative business day when the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of one or more nonconformities, whichever occurs first. The reasonable offset for use shall be equal to one percent of the purchase price for every thousand miles of use.

"Replacement motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle which is identical or reasonably equivalent to the motor vehicle to be replaced, as the motor vehicle to be replaced existed at the time of original acquisition, including any service contract, undercoating, rust proofing, and factory or dealer installed options. A reasonable offset shall be made for the use of the motor vehicle and an additional offset may be made for loss to the fair market value of the vehicle resulting from damage beyond normal wear and tear, unless the damage resulted from the nonconformity.

"Substantially impairs" means to render the motor vehicle unfit, unreliable, or unsafe for warranted or normal use, or to significantly diminish the value of the motor vehicle.

481I-3 Motor vehicle: express warranties, return.

(a) If a motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity in writing to the manufacturer, its agent, distributor, or its authorized dealer during the term of the lemon law rights period, then the manufacturer, or, at its option, its agent, distributor, or its authorized dealer, shall make such repairs as are necessary to conform the vehicle to such express warranties, notwithstanding the fact that such repairs are made after the expiration of such term.

(b) If the manufacturer, its agents, distributors, or authorized dealers are unable to conform the motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition which substantially impairs the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle after a reasonable number of documented attempts, then the manufacturer shall provide the consumer with a replacement motor vehicle or accept return of the vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the following: the full purchase price including, but not limited to, charges for undercoating, dealer preparation, transportation and installed options, and all collateral and incidental charges, excluding finance and interest charges, and less a reasonable offset for the consumer's use of the motor vehicle. If either a replacement motor vehicle or a refund is awarded, an "offset" may be made for damage to the vehicle not attributable to normal wear and tear, if unrelated to the nonconformity. Refunds made pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed to be refunds of the sales price and treated as such for purposes of section 237-3. Refunds shall be made to the consumer and lien holder, if any, as their interests may appear on the records of ownership. If applicable, refunds shall be made to the lessor and lessee pursuant to rules adopted by the department of commerce and consumer affairs.

(c) It shall be an affirmative defense to any claim under this section that a nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle by a consumer.

(d) It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties, if, during the lemon law rights period, any of the following occurs:

(1) The same nonconformity has been subject to examination or repair at least three times by the manufacturer, its agents, distributors, or authorized dealers, but such nonconformity continues to exists; or

(2) The nonconformity has been subject to examination or repair at least once by the manufacturer, its agents, distributors, or authorized dealers, but continues to be a nonconformity which is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven; or

(3) The motor vehicle is out of service by reason of repair by the manufacturer, its agents, distributors, or authorized dealers for one or more nonconformities for a cumulative total of thirty or more business days during the lemon law rights period. The term of the lemon law rights period and such thirty-day period shall be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of a war, invasion, strike, fire, flood or other natural disaster. The presumptions provided in this subsection shall not apply unless the manufacturer has received a written report of the nonconformity from the consumer and has had a reasonable opportunity to repair the nonconformity alleged. Upon a second notice of the nonconformity, or, if the motor vehicle has been out of service by reason of repair in excess of twenty business days, the dealer shall notify the manufacturer of the nonconformity.

(e) During the lemon law rights period, the manufacturer or its agent, distributor, or authorized dealer shall provide to the consumer, each time the consumer's vehicle is returned from being diagnosed or repaired under the warranty, a fully itemized, legible statement or repair order indicating any diagnosis made and all work performed on the vehicle, including, but not limited to, a general description of the problem reported by the consumer or an identification of the defect or condition, parts and labor supplied, the date and the odometer reading when the vehicle was submitted for repair, and the date when the vehicle was made available to the consumer. The consumer shall sign and receive a copy of the statement or repair order.

(f) Upon request from the consumer, the manufacturer, or at its option its agent, distributor, or authorized dealer, shall provide a copy of any report or computer reading regarding inspection, diagnosis, or test-drive of the consumer's motor vehicle, and shall provide a copy of any technical service bulletin related to the nonconformity issued by the manufacturer regarding the year and model of the consumer's motor vehicle as it pertains to any material, feature, component, or the performance thereof. Upon receipt of a consumer's written report of a nonconformity to the manufacturer, the manufacturer or, at its option, its agent, distributor, or authorized dealer, shall inform the consumer of any technical service bulletin or report relating to the nonconformity, and shall advise the consumer of the consumer's right to obtain a copy of such report or technical service bulletin.

(g) The manufacturer, its agent, distributor, or authorized dealer, shall provide the consumer at the time of purchase of the motor vehicle a written notice setting forth the terms of a state certified arbitration program and a statement of the rights of the consumer under this section in plain language, the form of which has been previously reviewed and approved by the department of commerce and consumer affairs for substantial compliance with title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703, as may be modified by the requirements of this chapter. The written notice must specify the requirement that written notification to the manufacturer of the motor vehicle nonconformity is required before the consumer is eligible for a refund or replacement of the motor vehicle. The notice must also include the name and address to which the consumer must send such written notification. The provision of this statement is the direct responsibility of the dealer, as that term is defined in chapter 437.

(h) The consumer shall be required to notify the manufacturer of the nonconformity only if the consumer has received a written notice setting forth the terms of the state certified arbitration program and a statement of the rights of the consumer as set out in subsection (g).

(i) Where the state certified arbitration program is invoked by the consumer of a motor vehicle under express warranties, a decision resolving the dispute shall be rendered within forty-five days after the procedure is invoked. If no decision is rendered within forty-five days as required by this subsection, the dispute shall be submitted to the regulated industries complaints office of the department of commerce and consumer affairs for investigation and hearing. Any decision rendered resolving the dispute shall provide appropriate remedies including, but not limited to, the following:

(1) Provision of a replacement motor vehicle; or

(2) Acceptance of the motor vehicle from the consumer, refund of the full purchase price, and all collateral and incidental charges. The decision shall specify a date for performance and completion of all awarded remedies.

(j) Any action brought under this section must be initiated within one year following expiration of the lemon law rights period.

(k) No vehicle transferred to a dealer or manufacturer by a buyer or a lessee under subsection (b) may be sold or leased by any person unless:

(1) The nature of the defect experienced by the original buyer or lessee is clearly and conspicuously disclosed on a separate document that must be signed by the manufacturer and the purchaser and must be in ten point, capitalized type, in substantially the following form: "IMPORTANT: THIS VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER BECAUSE A DEFECT(S) COVERED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S EXPRESS WARRANTY WAS NOT REPAIRED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AS PROVIDED BY HAWAII LAW.";

(2) The defect is corrected; and

(3) The manufacturer warrants to the new buyer or lessee, in writing, that if the defect reappears within one year or 12,000 miles after the date of resale, whichever occurs first, it will be corrected at no expense to the consumer.

(l) A violation of subsection (k) shall constitute prima facie evidence of an unfair or deceptive act or practice under chapter 480.

481I-4 Arbitration mechanism.

(a) The department of commerce and consumer affairs shall establish and monitor a state certified arbitration program which is in substantial compliance with title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, part 703, as may be modified by this section, and shall adopt appropriate rules governing its operation.

(b) The director of commerce and consumer affairs may contract with an independent arbitration organization for annual term appointments to screen, hear, and resolve consumer complaints which have been initiated pursuant to section 481I-3. The following criteria shall be considered in evaluating the suitability of independent arbitration mechanisms: capability, objectivity, experience, non-affiliation with manufacturers of or dealers in new motor vehicles, reliability, financial stability, and fee structure.

(c) If a consumer agrees to participate in and be bound by the operation and decision of the state certified arbitration program, then all parties shall also participate in, and be bound by, the operation and decision of the state certified arbitration program. The prevailing party of an arbitration decision made pursuant to this section may be allowed reasonable attorney's fees.

(d) The submission of any dispute to arbitration in which the consumer elects non-binding arbitration shall not limit the right of any party to a subsequent trial de novo upon written demand made upon the opposing party to the arbitration within thirty calendar days after service of the arbitration award, and the award shall not be admissible as evidence at that trial. If the party demanding a trial de novo does not improve its position as a result of the trial by at least twenty-five per cent, then the court shall order that all of the reasonable costs of trial, consultation, and attorney's fees be paid for by the party making the demand. If neither party to a non-binding arbitration demands a trial de novo within thirty days after service of the arbitration award, the arbitrator's decision shall become binding on both parties upon the expiration of the thirty-day period.

(e) Funding of the state certified arbitration program shall be provided through an initial filing fee of $200 to be paid by the manufacturer and $50 to be paid by the consumer upon initiating a case for arbitration under this section. Every final decision in favor of the consumer issued by the independent arbitration mechanism shall include within its relief the return of the $50 filing fee to the consumer. The director of commerce and consumer affairs may establish a trust fund for the purpose of administering fees and costs associated with the state certified arbitration program.

(f) The failure of a manufacturer to timely comply with a binding decision of a state certified arbitration program shall be prima facie evidence of an unfair or deceptive act or practice under chapter 480 unless the manufacturer can prove that it attempted in "good faith" to comply, or that the failure was beyond the manufacturer's control, the result of a written agreement with the consumer, or based on an appeal filed under chapter 658.

In essence, the Lemon Laws provide that if you purchase (and in some states, lease) a brand new or pre-owned car or other vehicle with a manufacturer's warranty that is found to be damaged after repeated repair attempts, and the original producer can't rebuild it in spite of recurrent efforts (in a designated time limit that varies from state to state), or if the item is not usable for a limited time period (usually 30 days) due to its problems, you are entitled to a broad range of costs, including:

1. Monetary damage settlements
2. A return of the original price
3. A brand new car
Moreover, almost all the Lemon Laws (as well as the Federal Warranty Law) have a fee transferring mechanism which provides that if you win your suit, the manufacturer or dealer that sold you the lemon is forced to compensate you for legal fees.


Lemon Law Statutes
State-specific Lemon Law Regulations
Each of the 50 states has its own Lemon Law statute. Even though the verbiage of each state's statute are different, the average state Lemon Law statute offers aid for buyers with a broken-down vehicle covered by a warranty if:

1. The car dealership or original producer just can't actually remedy a specific problem in the product after a sensible number of repair attempts (typically at least three);
2. The motor vehicle cannot be used for at least 30 days due to faults in the automobile; or
3. The dealer or original producer just can not fix a failing that is a considerable safety risk.

More often than not, a bad car is a car with a condition or condition that frequently impares its usability, economic value, or safety to the consumer and does not conform to the warranty. In most instances, the time period in which the Lemon Laws are applicable are rather short; the defects and resulting repair attempts (or out-of-service time) typically must occur during the first 2-years or 24,000 miles in which the purchaser owns the automobile. However, a number of states have even shorter time periods. Furthermore, many states have notice and trigger prerequisites, such as expecting the consumer to send off registered mail notice to the manufacturer of the shortcomings and giving the dealer an opportunity to correct the car. In addition, some states require that Lemon Law claims be settled through an arbitration program.

Generally, state Lemon Law regulations also apply to leased cars and used automobiles bought whilst under the producers basic warranty. A number of state Lemon Laws also are applicable to cars other than passenger automobiles. depending upon the consumer's home residence, or the state in which the consumer bought the automobile, Lemon Laws may apply to:

-RV's
-Motorcycles
-Pleasure Craft
-Other consumer goods (like computers)
There are many effective solutions possible under the Lemon Laws. Often times, if the manufacturer just can not correct the car, the consumer can either demand the manufacturer to replace the motor vehicle, or insist the manufacturer to reposess the motor vehicle and return the price paid along with incidental costs, including all invoices, towing costs, repair charges, related travel costs and other charges incurred by the consumer as a result of the shortcomings in the motor vehicle. Another important remedy available under most Lemon Laws is legal fees. In almost all states, if you win in a Lemon Law lawsuit, you will not have to pay any legal bills-the motor vehicle manufacturer that sold you your lemon is obligated to pay attorneys' charges.

The defendant motor vehicle manufacturing business can use various defenses to a Lemon Law claim. The standard statute provides that the manufacturing business is not guilty if it can verify that the flaws in question persisted due to harm, carelessness, or the alteration or modification of a car by somone other than the original equipment manufacturer, an agent, or an authorized repair facility. Restated, if the consumer maltreats his or her own motor vehicle, or the shortcomings were the fault of tampering or adjustments performed by an unauthorized dealer, the original equipment manufacturer could not be liable.


Federal Lemon Law Statutes
The Magnuson Moss Act
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is the federal law that moderates consumer product warranties. Ratified by Congress in 1975, the Magnuson Moss Act requires manufacturing business and dealers of consumer goods to provide customers comprehensive info about warranty coverage benefits. Additionally, it shapes both the rights of consumers and the obligations of warrantors under original warranties.

Even though the Magnuson Moss Act doesn't require an car original producer to supply purchasers with a warranty, if a warranty is supplied, the Magnuson Moss Act affords a number of protections for the consumer. The Magnuson Moss Act makes it more easy for buyers to sue for not honoring the warranty by making breach of warranty noncompliance of federal law, and by allowing for consumers to recover court costs and reasonable attorney's charges.

The Magnuson Moss Act is oftentimes effective in a lemon lawsuit where, for some reason, a state Lemon Law claim is not possible or otherwise unfit. For example, divaricate from the rather short period offered to public consumers inside most Lemon Laws, you can file a claim for breach of warranty after the warranty period has passed as long as the defects occured during the warranty period. Moreover, although many Lemon Laws restrict their coverage to a very specific list of motor vehicles, the Magnuson Moss Act is relevant to nearly all consumer products. The Magnuson Moss Act might also be applicable if you purchased or leased a expended automobile without a manufacturer's warranty, or if the automobile is covered by a service contract or other variety of extended warranty.


The Uniform Commercial Code
The Uniform Commercial Code (referred to as "UCC") has been enacted in all 50 American States. It is the primary foundation of law regulating warranties on consumer goods, including vehicles and other items. The UCC offers a legal course for public consumers with lemon problems.

UCC code stipulates that the buyer of a product is entitled to return goods that break in any regard to the consumer agreement. Therefore, if your new car doesn't work as guaranteed by the manufacturing business (your original warranty is part of your warranty), you may file a claim referencing the UCC in addition to whatever other claims you might have.

The period for taking back a car with the UCC is not limitless. If you come upon a deficiency in your automobile within a sensible review period, you may refuse the automobile. Unfortunately, brand new motor vehicles can be oftentimes mechanically enigmatic and you may not understand if your product conforms to the warranty till after you buy the product and defects begin to come up. Fundamentally, if Long after this review time you don't take back the product, you will be said to have approved of it and might have no claim through the UCC.

The length of the review time period is not outlined in the regulation. The Courts determine how long the reasonable review period is based on the purchaser's proficiency and personal experience, the purchaser's difficulty in seeing the gremlin, and the purchaser's opportunity to discover the flaw.

In spite of this limit, the UCC stipulates that in certain examples where a buyer is said to have accepted goods (i.e. the reasonable review time has expired), a buyer may still recant his acceptation of those goods where the non-conformity considerably degrades the value of the goods to him. Those examples include cases where it proves laborious to detect the nonconformity or the buyer was guaranteed that the non-conformity would be repaired. Put differently, the court will relieve the buyer from not rejecting the goods where the buyer could not have reasonably done so, or where the manufacturer promised the buyer that the problems would be repaired.
When a auto excessively breaks down and you have to keep bringing it back to the car dealership for repair under the written warranty, the automobile lemon law can be your next recourse. The problem should be substantial where it hampers your driving the automobile or your safety. A automobile stalling frequently would be a substantial problem. This is exactly the type of problem that can diminiah your driving and your safety. Under the car lemon law you are not expected to indicate why the automobile is stalling, you only have to verify that it is stalling. Put simply you need to check out the lemon law in these 3 examples: the automobile keeps dying inside the warranty time period, the automobile is a safety hazard, the dealer is not able to correct the automobile when it is warranted.

If you have a car which is a lemon you can directly write to the maker and ask for a replacement car. If this requirement is not acceptable to the maker, you can move into an arbitration process. A few makers have their own arbitration process. Other makers use third party arbitration program including Autoline by the Better Business Bureau. The judgment of the arbitrators is binding on the maker but not on the buyer. If unsatisfied with the assessment, the buyer can take the maker to court.

Virtually all regulations stipulate that the buyer ought to be restored back to the financial position they were in prior to purchasing the motor vehicle, less the amount that the buyer benefited from by using the motor vehicle. To get the repayment sum various elements are considered such as was it a sale or a lease, the purchase price, taxes and license, and mileage etc.
Some nearly new pre-owned vehicles will qualify under basic lemon laws. For example, a pre-owned automobile may fall under regular lemon laws if it is less than a year old and has got less than 12,000 miles on the odometer. States that do have a pre-owned car lemon law may be extra generous with the age and amount of mileage. Still, the car has to be sold by a car dealership that offers a written warranty. Individual sales are not involved, neither are automobiles sold under a declared original cost. There may be other restrictions to a used car lemon law such as the purposes in which the motor vehicle is pre-owned or the classification of motor vehicle. Older vehicles, are ordinarily excluded from used car lemon laws. Used car lemon laws usually cover a much shorter period of time than brand new car regulations. They usually range from 30 to 90 days, depending on your pre-owned car's mileage.
When selecting a lawyer for your lemon case, make sure that your lawyer is knowledgeable about the regulations that are applicable to your state. Also enquire about the pricing system. Many lemon law lawyers need a relatively humble retainer to cover a lemon law claim, and subsequently, the attorney's fees are sent to the maker. Fundamentally, lemon law claims are generally very low-cost to customers. The reimbursement of lawyer invoices differs from state to state. About half of the states allow you to recover your Lawyer charges if you win. The attorney's fee is based on actual time expended rather than being bound to any percentage of the recovery. In a select few States, you must pay the manufacturer's attorney's charges if you lose.

Consumers should register their charges in writing and keep a copy. In any written correspondence, always outline how burdensome it is to bring the automobile to the dealership for repairs and that the reliableness that the customer believed He was getting has been non-existent. Any written correspondence with a car dealership or maker needs to be sent using certified mail service. In many claims the makers claim that they have not had the required number of tries to fix the defect. They rely on the fact that the customer doesn't keep repair receipts for each occurance they have driven the auto into the dealership. They also assume on the possibility that the repair receipts have different parts fixed every period establishing that they have not fixed the same condition. Consumers ought to reply by demanding that authorized dealerships always send them a warranty repair order. Consumers should also debate that these unwritten visits are attempts.

Make sure to be mindful of your lemon law rights. Upon purchase, immediately page through your owner's binder and warranty references completely, and the info pertaining lemon law rights which you should get when you buy your vehicle. Don't depend on your dealer to teach you what defects are covered by warranty. If your dealer states that a condition is not covered and you believe that he or she is purposely deceiving you, be civil but confident. Don't be afraid to bring out the segment of the warranty that is relevant, or to call the original producer for substantiation utilizing the contact info included within your owner's binder. You shouldn't be obliged pay for repairs pertained to lemon law complaints. It's also important to notify the original producer of a complaint promptly. If you think that your car has a defect that cannot be remedied, check into your lemon law rights to see when you are able to file a lemon law complaint.

Lemon Law Tips:

1. Take your car in early - as soon as something appears wrong.
2. Hold onto repair orders - Always obtain a work order when you take the vehicle for repairs, and always obtain a completed repair order when work is completed. Be sure the work order reflects your own thoughts and comments regarding your complaints. If the technician summarizes or changes your complaint too much, have that technician add your corrected comments. Sign and receive a copy of the repair Order before leaving.
3. Be consistent in your complaints. Lemon Laws generally require that a manufacturer's authorized repair facility be provided with a reasonable number of opportunities to repair the same problem(s). Therefore, be as consistent as possible on each repeated repair attempt in describing the problem(s) you are having. This will establish that the problem is the same recurring problem, and will make any potential lemon law claim easier to establish and prove.

4. Look for TSBs: Technical Service Bulletins are issued by manufacturers regarding common defects or repairs in certain automobile models. Your dealer will not seek to tell you about TSBs unless you ask. Ask the dealer to make note of your TSB request on the repair order, even if your dealer tells you that none exist for your problem.
5. Watch for bad advice - Dealers and manufacturers personnel, without intending to, frequently practice law by giving you their version of lemon laws. Typically it is wrong and may be detrimental to your case. It doesn't matter whether the reason for this misinformation is unintentional or not. The effect is similar. So check any advice given by the dealer or manufacturer before making any decision that may harm your case.

6. Beware of arbitration - Manufacturers frequently recommend arbitration or even imply that it is a mandatory prerequisite to resolving your problem. Arbitration is neither desirable nor mandatory! And it is absolutely not a prerequisite for making a lemon law demand!
Leading Misconceptions regarding the Lemon Laws

If my case does not qualify for the lemon law there is nothing I can do.
Attorneys regularly take cases that do not meet the lemon law criteria. All purchasers of defective products have a legal right to compensation. They frequently take cases which do meet the mileage or repair criteria of the lemon law, bring them in court, and secure compensation or other relief for the buyer.

Hawaii Cities:
Choose your City/Zipcode